Journalists need to write environmental stories in an engaging and compelling fashion, Willis Duff said Saturday. "I believe that [poor public response to environmental stories] overwhelmingly has to do with composition and research," he said. "Stories concerning education, issues of the family, and the environment often are not very well executed by reporters." Duff, chief creative officer of Audience Research and Design--a media consultancy that helps news organizations decide what's news, joined panelists Rod Jackson, Peter Thomson and Lawrence McGill at the Seventh Annual Society of Environmental Journalists conference to share reasons why environmental issues get so little media coverage. A report presented by Lawrence T. McGill, director of research at the Freedom Forum's Media Studies Center, showed that the total number of minutes given to the coverage of environmental issues on the weekday nightly newscasts steadily declined from 1989 to 1996 showing only a slight increase in 1994. The 1989 peak in news coverage was due to the Exxon Valdez oil spill. The 1994 increase featured the continued clean-up efforts and lawsuits that resulted from that disaster. Peter Thomson, former editor and current host of National Public Radio's weekly environmental program Living on Earth, said "The news hole for environmental issues is becoming smaller." He said one explanation for limited coverage is that environmental disasters cannot be resolved quickly by the news media. Comprehensive and continual day-to-day coverage disinterests the viewer. McGill said 80 percent of all local news broadcasts provide coverage that can be viewed on all three networks and 20 percent is left to provide stories that are unique to that station. Environmental issues only make it into a station's unique part of the broadcast when made into a feature. "Breaking news events may drive journalistic decisions, but ratings [for environmental events] are lower than expected," McGill said. Because viewer ratings are important to networks media research is conducted to help stations decide what type of news should be included in a broadcast. However, the results are sometimes misleading, he said. "Media researchers may be told that an audience will watch, but the audience doesn't follow-up," McGill said. Thomson and NPR are not driven by ratings or the need to please sponsors and shareholders. "NPR is an anomaly--we do what do because of [the low ratings for environmental coverage in other broadcast outlets]," he said. "We have autonomy." However, Thomson said, they are driven by the foundations that provide funding. "Sometimes we can't get funding for what we would like." The future of environmental reporting may lie in the hands of television news magazines like Dateline NBC, McGill said. News magazines have the luxury of casting experts and taking the time to cover issues thoroughly. Despite suggestion that stories broadcast on news magazine shows may not be taken seriously, McGill said survivor stories that show human emotion can create a vast viewing audience.
Rod Jackson, moderator and producer of ABC News/NewsOne in Los Angeles, said another way to get environmental stories covered includes journalists pitching ideas to editors by putting a unique spin on the story. For example a story may be about hiking, but interwoven in that can be facts about the terrain hiked. And if editors still make decisions not to include the environmental story, newsrooms can always rely on stories that have always had a high viewer response. These include stories focusing on air and water quality, disposable wastes, and more recently, weather-related stories, Duff said. McGill said stories that show threats to personal health and create a "fear factor" are also well received. Thomson said journalists should tell the ramifications of a specific environmental occurrence. "It is incumbent upon journalists to fill in the context of an environmental event--they need to tell the bigger picture." Thomson said, "[The audience] responds better to stories which address solution." |